Mayoral Choice

We are very privileged in Squamish to have so many fine candidates for Mayor in this election. I am pleased to say that I could support any one of them. They all bring dedication, experience, and competencies to the table.

However, myself, and everyone else, only get to choose one. For the next four years, if I am elected, the people of Squamish will know how I vote on issues that are important to them for this community. Although it would be safer not to publicly choose, I feel at this time, I would like to let you know who I am endorsing for Mayor and why.

However, I want to first outline sincerely the great things each candidate brings to this race and is offering Squamish. Things they genuinely feel are in the best interests of our community.

Paul Lalli, born and raised in Squamish has a beautiful, large, young family who are front and centre in his campaign. His platform, as such, is focused on families with emphasis on recreational amenities such as swimming lessons. He also backs and believes a large four season resort is in the best interests of Squamish for job creation and future growth. He has experience on council for 10 years, but not in the immediate past. Squamish was built on large capital projects such as the deep water port and other industrial interests. I believe Paul Lalli wants what is best for Squamish through supporting family programming, and bringing large capital projects to town.  I recognize that focusing on families and big commercial projects are traditionally what Squamish voters look for in a Mayor like Paul Lalli. 

Jeff Cooke, is an entrepreneur and avid outdoorsman, with local non-governmental board experience, and a business focus. Jeff’s dedication to the trails and outdoor areas of Squamish shows a true love of all that Squamish has to offer. His experience as a businessman would bring an understanding of many of the challenges facing small business and larger commercial ventures in Squamish. I believe Jeff Cooke’s business based leadership would help encourage economic growth for Squamish, while partnering with recreational interests to manage the many pressures on our outdoor tourism industry. I recognize that is why a lot of people have moved here and that is what they want from Jeff Cooke as their Mayor.

Karen Elliot, with experience on the current council, has shown she has a measured approach to decision making. She has an understanding of the issues facing Squamish, such as policy needs for short term rentals, daycare, and the Official Community Plan. Karen will be able to competently deal with any issues that come before council.  I believe that Karen is a steady hand at the tiller, and in touting the current council’s numerous accomplishments, would continue to move Squamish in the direction it is heading. I recognize that many people, especially in steadier times, prefer a measured hand for their choice of Mayor who is Karen Elliot.

I have carefully considered all of these great choices for Mayor, have attended numerous council meetings, where two of them currently participate and vote, have listened intently to all their positions at the three stakeholder forums, and have reviewed their answers, as well as their platforms, and their websites. I have come to this decision based on what the candidates have campaigned on and emphasized in their records, their levels of experience, qualifications and platform. I am happy to work with any of them and confidently believe they will all put forward the best interest of Squamish as they see it.

But I must choose one and I have. I am endorsing Susan Chapelle for Mayor.

white susan

Susan Chapelle (cv),is a two-term Squamish Councillor for the past 7 years, local businesswoman, outdoor recreation enthusiast, classical musician, hockey-playing mom, union stage hand, health care and sexual assault advocate, with an MBA focusing on  Community Development.  She is passionate about her beliefs and lives them. Susan has a vision for an inclusive, economically diverse, sustainable Squamish where we can all afford to live and have a business; and she is willing to stand up and fight for that Vision.

Susan applauds the significant accomplishments of our current council, while still championing that we can do better:

Susan has a plan for creating a Local Housing Authority to address affordable housing needs in Squamish, arguably our most critical need.  She has worked with the provincial government on bringing health initiatives to Squamish and will direct that same passion to ensuring social housing gets long term funding. She is willing to mandate commercial and industrial lands are protected with zoning requirements,  preserving and creating a diversified tax base. This will relieve the tax burden on residential properties while bringing jobs to Squamish. With improved transportation access and infrastructure as one of her main platforms and joint accomplishment with the current council, she is best positioned to champion a regional transit solution to support workers and ensure vulnerable populations have a safe means of travel. She will ensure Community Amenity Contributions are at a level that sustains infrastructure needs for the entire district.

You can either let change happen, or ensure change happens in a manner that benefits and improves the entire community! 

Squamish has been, and will be, pushed over by big developers and big business, unless we stand up for what is needed for this community with a vision for OUR future. I appreciate all of the numerous policies and decisions the current council has worked through. However, we can do better. We have given in too much and given away too much for too little in return.  We can’t stop development, but we can ensure it happens in a way that contributes enough to our community, to keep it functioning, whole and sustainable for everyone, now and into the future.

It is not steady times. It is not traditional times.  There are numerous stakeholder groups, including the vulnerable and marginalized, that need a strong voice now. And I believe that voice is Susan Chapelle.

Thank-You for your continued support and consideration. Sacha Fabry







Wood Fibre LNG

Understanding that WLNG is a Provincial and Federal jurisdiction, there is only so much at a Municipal level, that we have authority over.

We currently have no representation at the negotiating table and without District representation advocating for the best interest of Squamish, we will assume all the risk but gain none of the benefit through negotiated community supports.

My plan:

  • Ensure that Squamish council has representation at every meeting between WLNG and other government stakeholders.
  • Advocate about the continued safety concerns surrounding the project.
  • If the project does go forward, ensure that we are receiving appropriate tax revenue. (Evaluated at above $7 Million, while currently only $2 Million is being offered)

Sustainability is top priority, this includes sustainability of our environment and sustainability of our aging infrastructure. A worst case scenario is for this resource development to be approved by the Provincial and Federal regulators, Squamish assumes all the burden and most of the safety risk, and the community receives next to nothing in compensation. We do not have regulatory authority over this project but the voice of Squamish needs to be at that table.

Forum on the Environment Answers

So of course to prepare for the forum on the environment I wrote answers and then something else came out at the moment or everyone else had taken the answer so I made up something up on the fly, (Question 2)  So I wanted to give my answers in full that I prepared. Thanks so much again to Climate Action Network, Squamish Environment Society, and Citizens for My Sea to Sky for hosting the forum.

1. Environmental Health

What do you see as the three greatest threats to wildlife, habitat, and ecosystem health in Squamish? What are some concrete steps you will take to address these issues? How will you ensure they are part of the conversation when making decisions?

3 greatest threats:

  • Human wildlife interaction such as bears being euthanized because people leave out garbage threatening wildlife.
  • Crumbling and insufficient infrastructure can lead to raw sewage, and other leaks into the environment threatening ecosystems and habitats.
  • Development too close to sensitive habitat without a buffer zone or wildlife corridors.

Concrete steps to address:

  • Bring in a by-law to mandate garbage bins stored inside like Port Coquitlam and create wildlife corridors like in Banff.
  • Appropriate CAC to ensure safe infrastructure into the future
  • Consulting Experts and Trust in science as well as the Ministry of Environment to ensure appropriate buffers around development for wildlife.

How to ensure they are part of the conversation during decision making?

  • Always ensure there is an open and transparent process for community involvement. Invite Squamish stream keepers and Squamish River Watershed Society, Squamish Nation  to the table.
  • Consult with conservation officers, and Wildlife BC to ensure enforcement is in place in the areas where it is a problem with human wildlife interaction.
  • Ensure staff recommendations and reports are listened to for infrastructure deficiencies and plan into the future for improvements with appropriate funding.
  • Respect Department of Fisheries and Oceans BC recommendations for buffer zones

2)  Climate change

Climate change is a global problem that needs local solutions. What are tangible actions that Council can take to reduce carbon emissions/pollution from Squamish residents, businesses, industry, and local government?

    • Increase the number of electric charging stations, mandate charging stations in new construction.
    • Provide electric and bio-fuel fleet vehicles, like Vancouver
    • Encourage a car sharing program and an electric bike sharing program for Squamish.
    • Incentivize builders to use heat-at-point hot water systems, geothermal, passive heat recapture and passive solar solutions in their projects.
    • Increase active transit and regional transit options
    • Negotiate a gas levy dedicated to transit and greening the transit fleet in Squamish.

3) Development

What do you see as the three greatest challenges related to development in Squamish and how would you address them?

Greatest Challenges

  • What is being built?  Ensure energy efficient and smaller builds mandated and incentivized
  • Where are we building it? Away from sensitive habitat, respecting the science to create wildlife corridors and buffers around development. respecting green space in the OCP.
  • What is the process used to decide this? All stakeholder meaningfully engaged, in a process that follows standard timelines for input discussion, reflection, and changes. People want their council to listen to them. Overwhelming opposition should slow and change any proposed development.

Meet The Candidate: Sacha




Please go to Squamish Chief Election 2018 page to view all the candidates videos.

Garibaldi At Squamish Resort

Many people think this is a contentious issue. I think it’s simple, because a process exists to ensure Squamish decides: a referendum.

If 10% of Squamish residents or the council choose we can go to a referendum, and then it will be up to Garibaldi at Squamish to convince enough people through their community supports and business model that this is what we want for Brohm Ridge. I support a referendum on GAS

I would like to ensure we don’t make the mistakes of Whistler, and ensure there is adequate staff housing mandated as part of the project, regional and shuttle transit contributed and guaranteed. We must ensure that we will never need a food bank to support GAS workers like in Whistler, and there is enough rental housing in Squamish to support it, that will not just be short term rentals.

I have serious concerns about sewer and water infrastructure, environmental impact, hospital capacity and emergency response and fire stations to support a project of this scope. This burden can not be passed on to the District, when we are already grappling with a $40 million to $100 million infrastructure deficit.

If the project goes ahead CAC’s should be significant, such as building a new Brennan Park, new fire halls, and contributing to roads and sewers, not just the ones leading to the development, as it increases impact on the entirety of Squamish infrastructure.

I would also like to see guarantees of significant, good administrative jobs for the Squamish Nation, and profit sharing much like in Osoyoos. This should be transaformational legacy project for the Squamish Nation, not just a payout. This of course is the Squamish Nation’s jurisdiction but I would like to see a referendum of the Squamish Nation as well, for this project to proceed.